Password Keep me signed in Forgot your password? No account yet?
Home � My City � Story
Popular stories
Lifestyle
Tech it slow
My City
Bengali to EnglishYoung Bengalis has grown up with little Bengali
More
Lifestyle
New kids on the blockFive new cars set to enter Indian auto market
More
Culinary
Rustic flavours
My City
The brandwagon trundles into classBig brands are creating class divide in schools
More
Escape Route
Hit the roadHit the road for long drive holiday close to home
More

Mamata is a Gandhian leader: Mahasweta Devi

Posted On :18/08/2009
By Sujoy Ghosh
She’s been vocal in her criticism of the Left Front government’s land acquisition policy. For years, she’s been writing about and working for the tribals. Her commitment to women welfare and rural development has taken her to remote villages. She’s won national and international accolades for her contribution to literature. Even at the age of 83, she’s just as active as ever. Although a non-voter for over 30 years and professing no ideological leaning towards Trinamool Congress as a political outfit, she has implicit trust in Mamata Banerjee’s abilities. An exclusive interview with writer-activist Mahasweta Devi.
Mahasweta Devi
Mahasweta Devi has been a critic of the state govt's land acquisition policy.
You have a life-long commitment to tribal welfare. How do you see the tribal situation in West Bengal today?

I’d say that poor people, irrespective of their religious, cultural or communal allegiances, are deprived in West Bengal. There’s rampant corruption in BPL card distribution. The same is the case with the rationing system. The governance is corrupt, and the poor have to bear the brunt of this racket-driven system.

The tribal communities have always been neglected. It’s true that the state government created Paschimanchal Unnayan Parishad for the welfare of the tribals in Birbhum, Burdwan, Bankura, Purulia and West Midnapore. But the parishad has done nothing for the development of the tribal districts.

Why is Lalgarh, of all the places, a target of government oppression?

The Left Front government sold Lalgarh to the Jindal Group under SEZ. Fearing public outcry like that in Singur, the government wants the people to keep mum and this oppression is their way of scaring the tribals away from Lalgarh.

Given the rough terrain of Lalgarh, it’s not possible to dig tubewells there. But the few natural wells in that region have been rendered unusable by the joint forces personnel. Even now schools in Lalgarh serve as police or CRPF camps. As I give you this interview, 22-23 tribal organisations are demonstrating in West Midnapore. They want the government to pull the joint forces out of Lalgarh.

You have been a sharp critic of the Left Front government’s land acquisition policy, especially their strategy to acquire agricultural land from farmers in the name of industrialisation…

We are being branded as regressive and anti-industry, but our point is if land is indeed required for industrialisation, the government should focus on those areas where land lies fallow and farming is not the primary means of living. But Singur is a multi-crop area that produces all major types of rice grains throughout the year. It also produces wheat and many types of vegetables. The Nano factory in Singur would have snatched livelihoods from thousands of farmers. Moreover, an assembling plant can’t be called industry in the true sense of the word. I wrote as early as 2006 that car parts made at a factory in Rajkot, Gujarat were supposed to be assembled in the proposed Singur plant. Such a factory wouldn’t create a lot of new jobs.

Since Trinamool Congress won from the Singur constituency in two Assembly elections in a row, the state government wanted to “punish” the people of Singur. Industrialisation was an expression of their political vengeance.

Do you think Bengal has achieved anything in the last thirty-two years under the Left rule?

We were very happy when the Marxists came to power in 1977. We supported them whole-heartedly. But our dreams were shattered soon after. Villages have been neglected for thirty-two long years – like electricity, safe drinking water is a dream in many villages; the government has done nothing to ensure proper irrigation for farmlands; Indira Housing Scheme also failed. The Left Front government has proved itself a conglomerate of failures.

Is your association with TMC chief Mamata Banerjee ideological or purely personal?

See, I’m a non-voter since the 1970s, and can’t support Trinamool Congress from a strict ideological standpoint. But I have known Mamata Banerjee for the last twenty years. She’s the only political person who’s got the guts to resign from cabinet ministry three times. She’s not one to scam or misappropriate government funds. The state lathi-charged on her and tried to intimidate her in many other ways, but she’s always undaunted.

Moreover, there’s something very down-to-earth about her demeanour. Common people can easily approach her and she’s a great support for women. Acceptability to the masses is a politician’s greatest test and the TMC chief has passed this test with panache. And it’s this acceptability that makes Mamata a great leader of the people. It’s a very rare quality we found in another great leader of our country – Mahatma Gandhi. Mamata’s simple, down-to-earth character makes her a Gandhian leader.

Do you think Mamata can bring that much-needed change?

It’s difficult to predict how the next incumbent will be. But whoever grabs the Chief Minister’s chair must remember that after thirty-two years of misrule people have lots of unfulfilled expectations from their government. Even in rural areas, people have become aware of their rights – their demands can’t be suppressed any more.


ilovekolkata
Comment
Add New Search RSS
Chandan Ghosh   |202.125.68.xxx |2009-08-18 09:27:15
Mahasweta Devi is a respected personality. Her work for the tribals are unparallel in Bengal. We take her comments and thoughts very seriously. She definitely has earned a right to express her opinion about everything happening in the state. While I agree to heron the issue of 32 years of mismanagement of Bengal by the left, I will beg to differ with her on her comment on Nano factory in Singur. Pricipally I agree to the fact that Government should not take agricultural land for industrialisation. However we can not generalise. Nano factory would have become a big boost for industrialisation of West Bengal. This would have opened the door for many other industry. Considering this, the opposition parties should have played much more costructive role and could have claimed for more compensation for the farmers who lost their land. This could have sent a very positive signal to the people of Bengal that opposition parties are responsible. Anyway, I hope respected Mahasweta Devi will see this point and explain this to all political parties for future.
subhabrata som   |134.155.99.xxx |2009-08-22 12:57:27
Mr Ghosh then the question comes what kind of industry you are choosing. how many people at the end get jobs.
when you are making the cheapest car of the world surely you depend on technology not providing job to unskilled farmers.
only providing money to the land owners do not solve the problem.you also have to teach them investment options and a fixed source of income. ultimately you can anytime change a land from agricultural to industry but never the opposite. so you have to take great caution and proper planning from all corners which this unprofessional government totally lacks
Chandan Ghosh   |202.125.68.xxx |2009-08-27 09:49:59
Dear Mr Som, appreciate your feeling, concerns and comments. I also appreciate the issues that you have raised regarding educating landowners on investment etc. But when was it debated by political parties? Which party had put it as an agenda for public debate and arriving at a constructive solution? Nobody can support the work culture of the Communists which I personally believe has destroyed the work culture and the future of Bengal. But what has been TMC's performance on this issue? One can raise ten different questions on why NANO project was not to be supported. But time has come to understand that we must start doing things in Bengal even if it's not the best thing to do. It is 100 times more acceptable than not doing anything for industrialisation of Bengal which is actually the case for our state during the last 32 years!I also tend to disagree to the fact only because NANO was using latest technology, it was not good for creating jobs for the unskilled. We must consider the downstream projects also. Anyway, who are we to debate about this now. I look at it as a lost opportunity. Only because I am in opposition, it does not give me the liberty to block highways to make a point. I strongly believe that it could have been handled in a better and constructive manner. We have a very unprofessional government in the state. That is enough reason for the opposition to show that they are different and will make a difference to people's life if voted to power. Thanks.
Guest  - Mahasweta Devi is going insane   |210.211.232.xxx |2009-08-28 03:11:47
mamta gandhian leader !!!!!!!!!!!- joke of the century.
Nirmallya Seth   |203.27.235.xxx |2009-09-10 08:21:41
No doubt Mahasweta Devi is a respected personality and she has every right to express her view on the happenings in the state, but if you are a well wisher then it's can't one sided every time. Nowadays what we've seen that few people are protesting each and every activity done by the State Government. This is purely for Political gaining nothing else......?????
Alok  - What a great Joke!!!!!!!   |203.197.120.xxx |2009-09-11 08:02:52
No doubt Mahasweta devi is a respectable figure.But what a joke!!!! She dont voted since 1970!!! Ideologically She cant support TMC!!! She is not sure what the opposition will do if they come to power in 2011!!!But she is supporting them...She is trying to influence the people of Bengal to vote for TMC in the "PORIBORTON CHAI" banner!!!!Mamata is a great lady according to her but she is mum about the associates of Ms Banerjee!!!!Please Mahaswata Devi look around Mamata...and watch the faces.Cant you see the same faces those who created terror in 70's??? Mahaswata Devi we love you dont betray us
Subhrangshu Sekhar Manna  - Multi-crop land is an asset of a country   |193.175.8.xxx |2009-09-14 11:29:45
Perhaps it is too late, but I read the interview and the comments only to-day (14/09). To my view a multi-crop land is an asset of a country, a nation. Nothing can be its substitute, can replace it. A car factory can be on any land, and therefore it should be on that land which cannot be cultivated. Govt. had shown Tatas 3 spots, they chose Singur only because it is on highway (NH2/6?) and in close proximity to Calcutta! I do not have any objection against Nano in Purulia / Birbhum, but I have every objection against Nano in Singur.

Another comment. With great regards to Mahasweta Devi and Mamata Banerjee, I cannot accept that resigning from Cabinet Ministry 3 times is an evidence of guts. One may have difference in opinions, but it is more credit only when one can work with all others together and give a leadership. A central ministry is such a responsible and huge job that it needs to be busy / occupied in every minute. On the contrary Mamata declared at the very beginning that they will be 5 days in Bengal and 2 days in Delhi, being absent 7 / 12 cabinet meetings. These only prove the lack of seriousness wich is certainly not wanted.
Manipadma Datta     |220.227.148.xxx |2009-09-17 03:37:01
Like millions of other Indians and the members of the humanity, me too have very high respect for Mahasweta Devi. In fact, I'm a through reader of her literary work. In her creations we find a different Mahasweta who inspires us always to make a dipper dig into the life's questions. But the Mahasweta we find nowadays with Ms.Mamata Banerjee betrays her own image partially. Particularly, when we find her supporting Mamata as an individual along with other social 'Rip van Winkles' of our times, we are afraid, she is on the wrong side of history. All the allegations against the Left Front even holding good,faith shifting this way by a great visionary of our time seems to have arisen more from her personal disillusion than anything to do with ideology. Instead, in such a situation which could be a logical stand by a history-conscious person would be to reinforce the faith in history once again and thereby to form the public opinion that way. It's not that only Mamata is fighting against the LF, many many are fighting rather a tougher fight like the naxalites and the large number of LF insiders. So unnecessarily glorifying an individual only amounts to falling in the trap of decadent culture. I would like her to keep this in notice that what Mamata is fighting for is her personal political career. She is no Messiah since a history shitter can never be!
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

  Feedback| Disclaimer |Privacy Policy  
  Copyright © 2010. ilovekolkata.in. All Rights Reserved.