Password Keep me signed in Forgot your password? No account yet?
Home � News � Story
Popular stories
My City
Simulators, lurking in the darkVideo games have 'manifold effects on children'
More
Lifestyle
A brand new gameWorld’s best toymakers set up shop in India
More
Culinary
Flavours of the RajAnglo-Indian cuisine is fun and tangy
More
Lifestyle
'Eyeing' the nerdBig bold chic geeky frames make a comeback
More
Escape Route
Monsoon getawaysVisit India’s best nature trails during monsoon
More

26/11 ‘state’ slur on Pak

Posted On :10/03/2010
Ajmal Kasab: I Love Kolkata file pic
26/11 trial highlighted Pak's alleged role in the terror attacks.
Mumbai, March 9: The final phase of the 26/11 trial began today with the prosecution painting the attack as a “classic case of state-sponsored terrorism” and highlighting the Pakistani army establishment’s alleged role.

“The terror attack of 26/11 is a classic case of state-sponsored terrorism,” special public prosecutor Ujjwal Nikam said, opening the final arguments as Maharashtra home minister R.R. Patil and minister of state for home, Ramesh Bagwe, watched. The two paid a “surprise” visit to the courtroom inside the high-security Arthur Road jail.

Patil was home minister when the attack occurred on 26 November, 2008, and had to quit days later for saying “Bade bade sheheron mein aise chhote chhote haadse hote rehte hain (such small incidents do take place in big cities).” Patil was reappointed home minister after his party, the NCP, retained power with ally Congress last October.

Nikam repeated the theme of Pakistan’s alleged involvement — “the attackers were provided military training” and “any other organisation could not provide such detailed training as it is taught only in the military”. But he did not put forward any additional evidence to buttress his claims other than the confessional statement by Mohammad Ajmal Kasab, the lone Pakistani gunman captured alive during the strike.

“Probably a few eyebrows will be raised in court. But an irrefutable, irresistible inference can be drawn that the attack was sponsored by state actors involved in (the) security apparatus (of Pakistan),” Nikam said. Kasab had referred to one “Major Saab” who he claimed was present during the training.

Lahore ruling

Lahore High Court today held that the confessional statement made by Kasab in Indian police custody was “a bad piece of evidence” and did not fulfil the requirements of the law of evidence. The ruling by the court’s Rawalpindi bench came as it upheld an anti-terror court’s order dismissing an appeal for acquittal from seven men, including Lashkar top gun Zaki-ur-Rahman Lakhvi, accused of involvement in the 26/11 attack.


The Telegraph
Comment
Add New Search RSS
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

stories of the week
Group supports Indian Institute of Cerebral Palsy
  Feedback| Disclaimer |Privacy Policy  
  Copyright © 2010. ilovekolkata.in. All Rights Reserved.